Phil walks through the blockchain TVL review.
Ethereum holds nearly three times as much DeFi capital as the next three chains combined. Base grew fastest last month. Both are true, and they answer different questions: who is biggest, and who is moving fastest. And all four fell on the day of the snapshot.
| Chain | DeFi TVL | 24h | 1 month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | $51.45B | −4.84% | +3.63% |
| Solana | $6.33B | −4.44% | +6.91% |
| Base | $6.13B | −4.51% | +8.86% |
| BSC | $5.62B | −2.57% | −2.16% |
DefiLlama · snapshot 26 Sep 2026 · dollar changes derived from displayed %
On DefiLlama's chain rankings, Ethereum's DeFi TVL is $51.447B. The next three, Solana, Base and BSC, hold $6.33B, $6.13B and $5.62B. Ethereum alone is about 8.4× Base and 74% of the four combined.
Below Ethereum the race is tight. Solana leads Base by just $204M, about 3.3% of Base's TVL. A price move or a single large protocol deposit could reorder them. Ethereum's lead isn't going to change on that kind of noise.
DefiLlama · DeFi TVL · USD B
Base posted the strongest monthly growth at +8.86%, 5.23 points ahead of Ethereum's +3.63%. Solana grew 6.91%; BSC was the only one to shrink, −2.16%.
Convert those rates to dollars and the picture flips. Ethereum's smaller percentage on a much bigger base added about $1.80B, more than twice Base (+$0.50B), Solana (+$0.41B) and BSC (−$0.12B) together. Neither view makes one network "better". One measures capital scale, the other recent momentum.
Monthly change · dollar values derived from displayed % and TVL
TVL (log scale) vs monthly change · bubble area = TVL
Top left: smaller and growing faster. Top right: large and still growing. Below zero: shrinking.
All four chains fell over 24 hours, between −2.57% and −4.84%. Three of the four are still up on the month. A headline built only on the daily change would erase the longer trend. But the monthly number also hides how sharp that last day was.
Working back from the two windows, the four chains together lost about $3.35B in 24 hours, more than their combined net gain over the month (about $2.59B). Measured up to the day before the snapshot, Ethereum was up about +8.9% on the month and Base about +14.0%. One day cut those to +3.6% and +8.9%. Whether that day is the start of a reversal needs the observations that follow it.
DefiLlama displayed changes
Indexed to TVL a month ago = 100 · month-ago and day-before values derived from displayed changes
Three points per chain only: the path between them isn't observed. Values derived as TVL ÷ (1 + change).
The Solana–Base gap of $204M equals about 3.3% of Base's TVL. If Base's TVL rose 3.3% with Solana flat, they would swap places. Both chains moved more than that in the last 24 hours alone. A ranking this close says little on its own; the trend over several snapshots says more.
Gap vs the moves both chains made in one day · USD M
The ranking gap is smaller than either chain's 24-hour move. Either could swap places on an ordinary day.
TVL moves when token balances change and when token prices change. A month of rising prices can lift TVL with zero new deposits; a falling day can cut TVL while deposits rise. So none of these changes, on their own, proves net inflows. Chain TVL also isn't total wealth on a network, and the provider's inclusion rules and optional categories change what's covered.
For ecosystem research, track what TVL is made of as well as its total. Growth spread across independent lending and trading apps means something different from growth concentrated in one pool. Separate token balances from prices before crediting depositors.
Illustrative · how Base's ≈$0.50B monthly gain could split
The snapshot can't tell these apart. Balance-based inflow data can.
Illustrative · two chains with the same $500M monthly TVL gain
Identical headline growth. One is broad adoption across apps; the other is a single protocol, perhaps a single incentive campaign.
What the snapshot supports today
$51.45B, 8.4× Base, 74% of the four.
+8.86%, provider-reported.
≈+$1.80B; derived from displayed %.
$204M gap, smaller than one day's moves.
Needs subsequent observations.
TVL mixes price and balance effects.
Ethereum leads on scale by a wide margin. Base leads on recent momentum. Solana and Base are close enough that their order is noise. All four had a sharp down day that a monthly table alone would hide.
To go further, track TVL composition, separate balances from prices, and follow several snapshots rather than one. That turns a leaderboard into evidence.
For a recurring chain review
Methodology and limits. A comparison of provider-displayed chain TVL from one rankings page retrieved on 26 Sep 2026. Ratios, shares and dollar changes use rounded displayed values; month-ago and day-before values are derived as TVL ÷ (1 + displayed change). TVL changes combine asset-price and balance effects and do not prove net inflows. Chain TVL is not total wealth held on a network, and the provider's inclusion rules and optional categories affect coverage. Exact upstream cutoffs were unavailable. Dashboards 08 and 09 are illustrative. Dated research, not a live feed. Not investment advice.